 |
Clearly this will not do. We must reconcile education with
liberty. We must find out some means of making men workers and, if need be, warriors,
without making them slaves. We must cultivate the noble virtues that have their root in
pride. Now no schoolmaster will teach these any more than a prison governor will teach his
prisoners how to mutiny and escape. Self-preservation forces him to break the spirit that
revolts against him, and to inculcate submission, even to obscene assault, as a duty. A
bishop once had the hardihood to say that he would rather see England free than England
sober. Nobody has yet dared to say that he would rather see an England of ignoramuses than
an England of cowards and slaves. And if anyone did, it would be necessary to point out
that the antithesis is not a practical one, as we have got at present an England of
ignoramuses who are also cowards and slaves, and extremely proud of it at that, because in
school they are taught to submit, with what they ridiculously call Oriental fatalism (as
if any Oriental has ever submitted more helplessly and sheepishly to robbery and
oppression than we Occidentals do), to be driven day after day into compounds and set to
the tasks they loathe by the men they hate and fear, as if this were the inevitable
destiny of mankind. And naturally, when they grow up, they helplessly exchange the prison
of the school for the prison of the mine or the workshop or the office, and drudge along
stupidly and miserably, with just enough gregarious instinct to turn furiously on any
intelligent person who proposes a change. It would be quite easy to make England a
paradise, according to our present ideas, in a few years. There is no mystery about it:
the way has been pointed out over and over again. The difficulty is not the way but the
will. And we have no will because the first thing done with us in childhood was to break
our will. Can anything be more disgusting than the spectacle of a nation reading the
biography of Gladstone and gloating over the account of how he was flogged at Eton, two of
his schoolfellows being compelled to hold him down whilst he was flogged. Not long ago a
public body in England had to deal with the case of a schoolmaster who, conceiving himself
insulted by the smoking of a cigaret against his orders by a pupil eighteen years old,
proposed to flog him publicly as a satisfaction to what he called his honor and authority.
I had intended to give the particulars of this ease, but find the drudgery of repeating
such stuff too sickening, and the effect unjust to a man who was doing only what others
all over the country were doing as part of the established routine of what is called
education. The astounding part of it was the manner in which the person to whom this
outrage on decency seemed quite proper and natural claimed to be a functionary of high
character, and had his claim allowed. In Japan he would hardly have been allowed the
privilege of committing suicide. What is to be said of a profession in which such
obscenities are made points of honor, or of institutions in which they are an accepted
part of the daily routine? Wholesome people would not argue about the taste of such
nastinesses: they would spit them out; but we are tainted with flagellomania from our
childhood. When will we realize that the fact that we can become accustomed to anything,
however disgusting at first, makes it necessary for us to examine carefully everything we
have become accustomed to? Before motor cars became common, necessity had accustomed us to
a foulness in our streets which would have horrified us had the street been our
drawing-room carpet. Before long we shall be as particular about our streets as we now are
about our carpets; and their condition in the nineteenth century will become as forgotten
and incredible as the condition of the corridors of palaces and the courts of castles was
as late as the eighteenth century. This foulness, we can plead, was imposed on us as a
necessity by the use of horses and of huge retinues; but flogging has never been so
imposed: it has always been a vice, craved for on any pretext by those depraved by it.
Boys were flogged when criminals were hanged, to impress the awful warning on them. Boys
were flogged at boundaries, to impress the boundaries on their memory. Other methods and
other punishments were always available: the choice of this one betrayed the sensual
impulse which makes the practice an abomination. But when its viciousness made it
customary, it was practised and tolerated on all hands by people who were innocent of
anything worse than stupidity, ill temper, and inability to discover other methods of
maintaining order than those they had always seen practised and approved of. From children
and animals it extended to slaves and criminals. In the days of Moses it was limited to 39
lashes. In the early nineteenth century it had become an open madness: soldiers were
sentenced to a thousand lashes for trifling offences, with the result (among others less
mentionable) that the Iron Duke of Wellington complained that it was impossible to get an
order obeyed in the British army except in two or three crack regiments. Such frantic
excesses of this disgusting neurosis provoked a reaction against it; but the clamor for it
by depraved persons never ceased, and was tolerated by a nation trained to it from
childhood in the schools until last year (1913), when in what must be described as a
paroxysm of sexual excitement provoked by the agitation concerning the White Slave Traffic
(the purely commercial nature of which I was prevented from exposing on the stage by the
Censorship twenty years ago) the Government yielded to an outcry for flagellation led by
the Archbishop of Canterbury, and passed an Act under which a judge can sentence a man to
be flogged to the utmost extremity with any instrument usable for such a purpose that he
cares to prescribe. Such an Act is not a legislative phenomenon but a psychopathic one.
Its effect on the White Slave Traffic was, of course, to distract public attention from
its real cause and from the people who really profit by it to imaginary "foreign
scoundrels," and to secure a monopoly of its organization for women.
And all this evil is made possible by the schoolmaster with his cane
and birch, by the parents getting rid as best they can of the nuisance of children making
noise and mischief in the house, and by the denial to children of the elementary rights of
human beings.
The first man who enslaved and "broke in" an animal with a
whip would have invented the explosion engine instead could he have foreseen the curse he
was laying on his race. For men and women learnt thereby to enslave and break in their
children by the same means. These children, grown up, knew no other methods of training.
Finally the evil that was done for gain by the greedy was refined on and done for pleasure
by the lustful. Flogging has become a pleasure purchasable in our streets, and inhibition
a grown-up habit that children play at. "Go and see what baby is doing; and tell him
he mustnt" is the last word of the nursery; and the grimmest aspect of it is that it
was first formulated by a comic paper as a capital joke. |
 |